Latest sources also make it very questionable whether Epstein's was a 'financier'. Latest filings of his lawyers already showed that he is definitively not a 'billionaire'. Is there any opposition to omitting "financier" is the lede? At least a hint in the lede that according to sources this is an image that Epstein paid to be promoted about himself?Īccording to latest sources it was mainly Epstein himself who promoted his image as 'billionaire financier' and he paid several journalists to paint this image what wouldn't be necessary if he was a real billionaire financier. Some editors argued for omitting "unnecessary" facts in the lede (and to have those in the article text).
0 kommentar(er)
